Attractions of the Village to the Tourists-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: What Are the Differences between Village City Visit? Answer: Introducation: The aim of the report was to answer three questions; One is why people want to visit a village? The second question was what are the attractions of the village to the tourists? Lastly, how much of each of the item is spent a day? A cross-sectional survey research lasting for 15 minutes was carried out on people who travel to village. Both qualitative and quantitative data was obtained. Questionnaires in form of electronic and copies were used to collect data and online questionnaires were filled by a sample of people who had been selected through probability sampling. It was found out from the research that people liked to visit villages because of the good village atmosphere ("Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Atmosphere in 2016", 2017). Another reason was found to be to escape the city. People go to village to escape from the city. The third reason to explain this is that the special village scenery and environment i.e. local history and heritage building attracted tourists to the vi llage. Answers to the second research question were also found. Three things were found t be the centre of attraction to people to the village, first is the good shopping experience in the village (Zarb, 2012). That is, the sales staff have good attitude that attracts tourists. On rating these factors of attraction, the first one that mostly attracted people to the village was the attitude of the sales staff followed by the neatness and cleanliness shops found in the village. There were also some specific items that a village needed to have in order to be attracting people to the village; the first requirement was availability of easy park and the second item is preserved heritage buildings. There were also findings on the amount item spent per day. The mostly spent ones were food shops and the most expensive items were found out to be food and drinks. People spent about 1227.3 dollars a day on these items. Limitations on the research were note. The first one is that people answered the questions on the questionnaire not on basis of their true natural feelings but on basis of what they believed to be more socially favorable. Their answers were based on societal judgment rather than individual feelings and thinking. The findings could not be equal and fairly true because may be the questions were answered by people from different races and culture that made the answers and feedback vary from an individual to another depending on the race and culture of the respondent (Glerce, 2015) Another alteration of the research could be caused by external factors that could not be controlled neither by the researcher nor the respondent. Time was also found to be a limitation in that if at the time the research is carried out the respondent has personal duties pending, he or she would fill the questionnaire carelessly and faster to create time for personal duties hence uncertainty arises concerning the answers given. The final limiting factor found was ethics. Ethics in res earch dictate that some questions should not be asked as they may mentally harm the respondent and therefore creates a gap on some information (Borrett, Sampson, Cavoukian, 2016). In conclusion, it was found that there are many positive factors whether basic needs, recreational facilities and cultural heritage that is in the village and is not be found in the urban areas. The uniqueness of the village from its scenery, food to people are the main factors that attract visitors to the village, Recommendations are made on how the limitations of the research can be addressed. The implications point out the resources fund in the villages that are not found in urban areas. ("Hygiene in food shops.", 1970) Conclusions The research carried out with an aim of finding out why people liked going o the village and the factors that attracted them tried to bring the distinction between life in town and the village. The findings portrays life in town and the village as two separate worlds and the village coming out as that section of the world that is still calm, organized and there is much embrace of culture and heritage. The first implication from the study shows that most people who visit the village try to find the calm atmosphere and simplicity found in the village unlike in the town where life is ever busy and complicated by many factors. The atmosphere in the village is calm and relaxed hence preferred by the people from urban areas. The second implication is that as much as people have moved to the urban areas ,they still value culture and their heritage and that is the reason as to why they travel to the village to enjoy the special scenery there brought about by local history and heritage buildi ngs .This attract tourists from different backgrounds and races. Another implication of the research is that people in the village are much friendly and caring more than people in the towns where people are busy minding their own businesses. The villagers have a welcoming attitude that attract tourists who prefer going shopping in the villages (Fu, 2008) .On rating the factors that attract the visitors the villages, attitude of sales staff remains to be the most considered factor. This implies that customer care in business matters a lot. The way customers are handled and attended t determines their level of satisfaction and their next visit to the shop. The second factor is neatness and how clean the shops are. In the village, shops are clean thus attract people who mind and value hygiene in shopping premises .Another implications that people prefer to go shopping in a place with ample parking for instance in the villages unlike in towns where there is much congestion due to high p opulation .There is an implication also that most visited places are the shops that sell food and much money is spent on food. This implies that food attracts people to a particular locality apart from other factors like good scenery. Limitations of the study lead to recommendations for future studies. The first limitation being answers given not from a personal perspective but societal view can be avoided by giving out the questionnaires to be filled anonymously gives the respondent the opportunity to express her or himself naturally because of the hidden identity. The uncertainty on the results can be avoided by not generalizing the findings on all people but it should be contextual. That is being specific to a particular culture and race. Time limit can be avoided by visiting the respondents when they are not busy to ensure that they answer the questions while their minds are fully present there. The overall implication o the whole research tries to point out that if action is no t taken; all revenue from tourism may end up being taken to the villages leaving the urban areas undeveloped since here is nothing much that attracts visitors. Therefore, if urban areas need to enjoy the same tourist visits as the village, it should use the above competitive advantages of the village to elevate the city References Zarb, J. (2012). TOURIST SHOPPING VILLAGES: Forms and Functions. Annals Of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1733-1735. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.05.018 Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Atmosphere in 2016. (2017). Atmosphere, 8(1), 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos8010008 Fu, D. (2008). Village people, village music and the theoretical significance of the concept that poetry can harmonize people. Frontiers Of Literary Studies In China, 2(3), 321-348. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11702-008-0013- Glerce, A. (2015). The has emerged. Seeking culture and psychology for Culture Psychology. Culture Psychology, 21(4), 455-468. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067x15615800 Borrett, D., Sampson, H., Cavoukian, A. (2016). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics, 174701611667313. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747016116673135 Hygiene in food shops. (1970). BMJ, 4(5731), 319-320. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.4.5731.319 Guo, Z. (2013). Home parking convenience, household car usage, and implications to residential parking policies. Transport Policy, 29, 97-106. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.005